Categories
Uncategorized

More on Innovation at Nokia

The NY Times today published a piece entitled “Nokia’s Bureaucracy Stifled Innovation, Ex-Managers Say“, revealing new details about individual cases where Nokia employees presented innovative ideas that were killed by managers unwilling to take risks or increase production costs. Nokia had a touchscreen phone in 2004, for example, and managers killed it for fear of it becoming a failure.

Another example I found particularly indicative of Nokia’s problem in idea conversion, related to Nokia’s infamous Symbian mobile operating system:

Juhani Risku, a manager who worked on user interface designs for Symbian from 2001 to 2009, said his team had offered 500 proposals to improve Symbian but could not get even one through.

“It was management by committee,” Mr. Risku said, comparing the company’s design approval processes to a “Soviet-style” bureaucracy. Ideas fell victim to fighting among managers with competing agendas, he said, or were rejected as too costly, risky or insignificant for a global market leader. Mr. Risku said he had left in frustration at its culture; he now designs environmentally sound buildings.

Mr. Risku also said that in 2002, he proposed a 3-D user interface for Symbian handsets, which at the time would have been unique to Nokia. He said his plan had been rejected because the software would have added $2.05 in production costs to each handset.

Categories
Uncategorized

Nokia – the innovation killer?

I just found out that a web service that I have relied upon to track my travel is on a one way train to nowhere. Dopplr, an elegant alternative to TripIt, was acquired by Nokia for around 20 million USD last September in a deal that I hoped would help extend the service’s functionality. Not happening, according to this article in the Guardian. A statement released by Nokia (after the article, of course) said that the site is now in “maintenance mode” and will not be developed further. The article goes on to list a number of other Nokia acquisitions that have resulted in … nothing. Nothing visible, at least. Several of Dopplr’s founders remain with the company and presumably contribute some value. Still, this story highlights an innovation-related question: generate, convert, and diffuse from within? Or acquire and hope the company’s people and technologies make a long-term contribution to your strategic objectives.

Categories
Uncategorized

IBM’s Palmisano Rips HP for Lack of Inventiveness

Mark Hurd’s departure from HP caused quite a fervor. After all, what’s juicier than a sex scandal and defecting to the competition? But it gets better: IBM wants to get in on the fun. This isn’t TMZ, but it’s pretty rich nonetheless. From a story published in the Wall Street Journal on September 15, 2010:

In a rare public broadside, IBM Chief Executive Samuel J. Palmisano said he doesn’t worry about companies such as H-P that have slashed their investments in core technologies and need to make expensive acquisitions to keep up. “H-P used to be a very inventive company,” Mr. Palmisano said in an interview at a Wall Street Journal event on Tuesday.

Palmisano went on to suggest that Mark Hurd’s focus on cost-cutting has undercut HP’s ability to innovate. While people at HP might disagree, Palmisano believes there’s a serious kink in HP’s innovation supply chain. On the other hand, Palmisano praised the efforts of Oracle CEO’s Larry Ellison to invest in the development of new technologies.